In a shocking criminal case, hunter William Custis Smith’s deliberate poisoning of more than 20 bald eagles and hawks has resulted in a mere day behind bars.
See the tweet below!
The sentence raises questions about the legal system’s commitment to safeguarding America’s national emblems.
Smith’s misguided attempt to protect ducks from natural predators has ignited outrage among conservationists and patriots alike.
William Custis Smith, a Virginia man, was convicted for poisoning over 20 juvenile bald eagles and hawks.
In his effort to preserve ducks for hunting, Smith deployed toxic fish heads laced with carbofuran, a banned pesticide.
Authorities initiated an investigation during the 2023-24 waterfowl season following reports of bizarre bird deaths.
Virginia Conservation Police Master Officer Brian Bratton led the extensive investigation which exposed the cruel and illegal tactics being employed.
Officers discovered a pole trap and the carcass of a juvenile bald eagle on Smith’s property, further implicating him in these heinous acts.
Lab tests confirmed that the eagle died from carbofuran poisoning, highlighting a grave threat to wildlife that has been banned for years due to its lethality.
William Custis Smith did not act out of ignorance; he was fully aware his actions were illegal.
“We’re fairly familiar with the guy. We’d dealt with him before on some waterfowl violations,” said Brian Bratton, pointing out that the defendant had built a makeshift waterfowl impoundment to attract ducks.
Smith’s justification, clearing out “predatory birds”, seems absurd, given the stringent regulations like the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act.
This particular case serves as a reminder of the precarious balance between human activities and wildlife conservation.
Apex predators like hawks and eagles play vital roles in maintaining ecological equilibrium, as noted by Dr. Bryan Watts.
These species control populations of other animals, crucial for a healthy ecosystem.
Yet, Smith’s actions jeopardized this balance, incurring only minor legal consequences.
A single day in jail, two years of probation, and $9,800 in fines appear insufficient for the scale of destruction wrought upon these federally protected birds.
— TheJFKReport (@TheJFKReport) June 4, 2025
As the case wraps up, the question remains: does this set a worrying precedent for future violations?
For now, the decision stands, and authorities are relieved to have halted further damage.
The case concluded with the involvement of the U.S. Attorney, closing a chapter that many hope will serve as a wake-up call for stricter wildlife protection enforcement and greater accountability.
